EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Digital Inequality and Digital Oppression: Mapping the Divide, Its Mechanisms, and Pathways to Equity

Nurul Islam, Catalina Georgeta Dinu

Digital Social Sciences · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

The gap in access, skills, use, and benefits from digital technologies that were initially identified as “digital inequality” has grown into a “digital oppression” the systematic exclusion, exploitation, and control of existing marginalized groups by digital systems design, deployment, and governance. This paper draws on the most recent scholarship to synthesize the various components of the digital divide and how they intersect with race, gender, class, disability, and geography. It explores how digital technologies replicate and, in some instances, reinforce existing power hierarchies such as algorithmic bias, data extraction through surveillance, exclusionary design, and the offshoring of dangerous forms of digital work to the Global South. The paper offers an overview of the effects of digital inequality in education, employment, health and civic life, based on data from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), peer-reviewed audits of commercial AI systems, investigative reporting and human rights reports regarding the platform economy, and foundational theoretical work in critical data studies. It argues that the digital divide is not a natural or temporary phenomenon of uneven technological diffusion, but a result of political and economic decisions and choices, and that closing the divide will require conscious investments in infrastructure, skills, inclusive design, and regulatory accountability.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nurul Islam, Catalina Georgeta Dinu
Quelle
Digital Social Sciences
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
3078-4980, 3078-4972
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Nurul Islam, Catalina Georgeta Dinu (2026). Digital Inequality and Digital Oppression: Mapping the Divide, Its Mechanisms, and Pathways to Equity. Digital Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.69971/dss.3.2.2026.60
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1