MALAYSIAN HOUSE OFFICERS' MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES: AN ANALYSIS USING A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY FRAMEWORK

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background: Mental health problems among Malaysian house officers represent an important public health concern because of their potential effects on individual well-being, clinical performance, patient safety, and healthcare workforce sustainability. House officers are particularly vulnerable during the transition from medical school to clinical practice, where they encounter demanding workloads, prolonged working hours, sleep deprivation, workplace bullying, fear of medical errors, and emotionally challenging clinical situations. This study examines major determinants of mental health problems among Malaysian house officers and considers strategies for strengthening psychological support within healthcare settings. Materials and Methods: This study adopts a literature-based approach incorporating critical analysis and proposes a prospective cohort framework to investigate associations between occupational stressors and mental health outcomes among house officers in Malaysian government hospitals. Under the proposed design, house officers would be recruited at the beginning of internship and followed for 12 months, with assessments conducted at baseline and every three months. Mental health outcomes would be evaluated using validated instruments, including the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Maslach Burnout Inventory. Results: The reviewed evidence indicates that Malaysian house officers experience substantial psychological challenges, particularly depression, anxiety, psychological distress, and burnout. Major contributing factors include excessive workload, long working hours, sleep deprivation, workplace bullying and intimidation, limited organizational support, fear of clinical errors, and difficulties maintaining work-life balance. These interconnected stressors may contribute to emotional exhaustion, impaired concentration, reduced job satisfaction and clinical performance, absenteeism, increased turnover intentions, and potential risks to patient safety. Supportive supervision, mentorship, mental health screening, peer support, anti-bullying measures, and improved working conditions were identified as important approaches to promoting psychological well-being. Conclusion: Mental health problems among Malaysian house officers require a comprehensive public health and organizational response. Addressing modifiable workplace stressors while strengthening early screening, psychological support, mentorship, supportive supervision, and anti-bullying policies may improve house officers’ well-being and contribute to safer patient care and a more sustainable healthcare workforce. The proposed prospective cohort framework could provide longitudinal evidence regarding the relationship between occupational exposures and subsequent mental health outcomes and inform future evidence-based interventions.