A Traceable Engineering-Evidence Framework for Maintenance Prioritization of Public Direct Current Fast Chargers

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Public direct current fast chargers generate heterogeneous operational snapshots, service records, and platform-specific diagnostics that cannot be treated directly as field-supported failures. Existing monitoring identifies abnormal states, while conventional Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) ranks an already defined failure taxonomy; neither explicitly operationalizes a qualification step between raw diagnostics and maintenance mechanisms. This study develops a pre-FMEA engineering-evidence framework integrating data normalization, subsystem classification, evidence registration, service-report correlation, manufacturer-document verification, and structured score review. The bounded case comprised 30 ABB Terra T54HV diagnostic datasets collected across multiple public sites during a January–December 2025 collection window (19,866 records and 877 unique keys) and 30 associated field service reports. The evidence set retained a common cross-source schema and linked diagnostic context to documented interventions; it is not claimed to represent all charger populations or a complete failure census. Of the diagnostic keys, 546 formed a common cross-source core and 217 varied across sites. Three primary service categories—communication and authorization, global interlock, and voltage-related cases—accounted for 25 of 30 documented interventions (83.3%). Their internally reviewed screening RPNs were 105, 90, and 72; no score was independently validated. The framework supports inspectable maintenance prioritization by preserving a source-to-mechanism evidence path, excluding snapshot repetition from occurrence, disclosing overlapping mechanism links, and retaining unresolved scores as provisional.