EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Infection Management: A Retrospective Observational Audit in a UK District General Hospital

Rand Izzet Abdulhadi Nakash

International Journal of Public Health and Nursing · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant global health threat driven largely by inappropriate antibiotic use. Optimising prescribing practices through antimicrobial stewardship is essential to reduce resistance and improve patient outcomes. To evaluate antibiotic prescribing practices in infection management within a UK district general hospital general internal medicine ward, focusing on compliance with guidelines, antibiotic consumption, microbiological investigation, and treatment outcomes. A retrospective observational audit was conducted between March and May 2025 on a general internal medicine ward at Eastbourne District General Hospital. Data from 65 antibiotic prescriptions were analysed and compared against NICE guideline NG15, the UKHSA “Start Smart - Then Focus” framework, and local antimicrobial guidelines. Co-amoxiclav accounted for 77% (50/65) of prescriptions, followed by levofloxacin (15%), meropenem (15%), and vancomycin (2%). Respiratory infections and sepsis were the most common indications. Repeat antibiotic courses were required in 68–70% of patients. Blood cultures were not performed in up to 18% of cases. The audit highlights several important challenges in antibiotic prescribing, including a high reliance on empirical therapy, frequent repeat prescribing, and inconsistent microbiological testing. Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship interventions, particularly 48–72-hour antibiotic review, improved biological investigation, and enhanced documentation, is necessary to improve prescribing practices and reduce AMR risk.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Rand Izzet Abdulhadi Nakash
Quelle
International Journal of Public Health and Nursing
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
3070-202X
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Rand Izzet Abdulhadi Nakash (2026). Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Infection Management: A Retrospective Observational Audit in a UK District General Hospital. International Journal of Public Health and Nursing. https://doi.org/10.54536/ijphn.v2i2.8212
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1