EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Crossref · journal-article

Critical Thinking Dimensions Among Nursing Students Across Educational Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study

Gita Adelia, Esperanza Zuriguel Pérez, Imelda Rahmayunia Kartika, Eka Malfasari, Arieny Rizafni

An Idea Health Journal · 2026 · Band 6 · Ausgabe 03 · S. 643-653

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background: Critical thinking is essential for nursing students to provide safe, evidence-based, and patient-centered care. Methods: This cross-sectional study described and compared critical thinking abilities among students in the Diploma III (D-3), Bachelor of Nursing (S-1), and Professional Nursing (Ners) programs at Institut Kesehatan Payung Negeri Pekanbaru. Of 521 eligible students, 493 participated, resulting in a 94.6% response rate. Data were collected using the N-CT-4 Students questionnaire and analyzed with the Kruskal–Wallis and Pearson’s chi-square tests. Result: Nearly half of the students (49.7%) demonstrated a moderate level of critical thinking. The educational program was not significantly associated with the critical thinking category, χ²(4) = 8.288, p = 0.082, Cramer’s V = 0.092. No significant differences were found across programs in the personal (p = 0.104), intellectual and cognitive (p = 0.408), interpersonal and self- management (p = 0.620), or technical dimensions (p = 0.673), with negligible effect sizes (rank ε² = 0.0016–0.0092). Conclusion: suggest that the three programs had similar critical thinking profiles at the time of measurement. Longitudinal studies using objective assessments are recommended to evaluate the development of critical thinking throughout nursing education.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Gita Adelia, Esperanza Zuriguel Pérez, Imelda Rahmayunia Kartika, Eka Malfasari, Arieny Rizafni
Quelle
An Idea Health Journal
Publikation
2026-08-16
Band / Ausgabe
6 / 03
Seiten
643-653
ISSN / ISBN
2797-0604
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Gita Adelia, Esperanza Zuriguel Pérez, Imelda Rahmayunia Kartika, Eka Malfasari, Arieny Rizafni (2026). Critical Thinking Dimensions Among Nursing Students Across Educational Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study. An Idea Health Journal, 6 (03), 643-653. https://doi.org/10.53690/ihj.v6i03.778
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1