EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.3928/08910162-20080701-01

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2000

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

<h4>Background</h4>Nursing education has long relied on rigid, protocol-driven teaching methods rooted in dominant historical models that emphasize memorization over meaningful understanding. These approaches no longer meet the demands of today's health care environment, where nurses must demonstrate critical thinking, creativity, and cultural responsiveness, autonomy, and advocacy. This review sought to synthesize evidence-informed pedagogical approaches that intentionally integrate both divergent thinking and convergent thinking into nursing education.<h4>Method</h4>A rapid review was conducted using CINAHL and PubMed databases to identify articles on pedagogies that elevate diverse student voices, foster independent critical and creative thinking, and promote advocacy. Relevant sources meeting predetermined inclusion criteria were reviewed.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty sources were reviewed. Findings show that students develop stronger critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills when learning moves beyond memorization and incorporates complex, socially grounded experiences.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Purposeful use of divergent thinking pedagogies produce independent nurse thinkers, leaders, and advocates necessary for today's health care.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2000-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
1 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2000). 10.3928/08910162-20080701-01. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20260707-01
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON