EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

A Critical Review of Procurement Acts: Toward a Framework for Regulatory Reform, Transparency and Digital Transformation in Public Procurement Governance

Adebowale Adedokun

International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Public procurement constitutes a cornerstone of public financial management, representing a significant proportion of government expenditure across developed and developing economies alike. Despite decades of regulatory reform, public procurement systems continue to grapple with persistent challenges of corruption, inefficiency, limited competition, and inadequate transparency. This paper presents a systematic review of procurement acts, examining their legal and regulatory architecture, identifying critical gaps and inconsistencies, and analyzing the key issues and challenges that undermine procurement effectiveness. Drawing on comparative analysis of procurement frameworks across multiple jurisdictions— including the United States, United Kingdom, European Union, Canada, India, Australia, Kenya, Singapore, Nigeria, South Africa, Brazil, and Ghana—this study synthesizes lessons from international best practices and high-profile procurement failures. The paper proposes a comprehensive reform agenda encompassing enhanced transparency mechanisms, strengthened oversight institutions, anti-corruption measures, e-procurement digitalization, performance-based contracting, and sustainable procurement practices. The findings suggest that effective procurement reform requires simultaneous attention to legal framework modernization, institutional capacity building, technological innovation, and stakeholder engagement. This paper contributes to the public procurement literature by providing an integrative framework for procurement act review that links regulatory analysis with practical reform implementation, offering actionable recommendations for policy makers, procurement practitioners, and governance scholars.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Adebowale Adedokun
Quelle
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2456-2165
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Adebowale Adedokun (2026). A Critical Review of Procurement Acts: Toward a Framework for Regulatory Reform, Transparency and Digital Transformation in Public Procurement Governance. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug466
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON