EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

From hype to clinical translation: A tiered, readiness-based framework for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Sri Harsha Boppana, Aditya Chandrashekar, Venkata Sunkesula

Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Artificial intelligence (AI) in gastrointestinal endoscopy is maturing unevenly. We organized this review around a predefined six-domain readiness framework: Evidence maturity, regulatory or health-system pathways, real-world deployment, workflow actionability, governance and monitoring, and generalizability. By these criteria, colonoscopy computer-aided detection is the sole clear tier 1 application, supported by multiple randomized trials and Food and Drug Administration clearances, though net patient-level value remains uncertain, and three concurrent guideline panels have issued discordant recommendations on identical evidence. Computer-aided diagnosis for optical polyp characterization remains tier 2 because two rigorous meta-analyses show no net benefit for the resect-and-discard strategy in routine practice. Upper gastrointestinal second-observer systems, AI-assisted procedural quality systems, capsule endoscopy reader-assist tools, and endoscopy-based Helicobacter pylori prediction are also tier 2, each limited by pathway uncertainty or limited deployment experience. Cholangioscopy AI, therapeutic endoscopy assistance, and endoscopic ultrasound-based pancreatic lesion analysis are tier 3, where technical performance consistently outpaces translational evidence. We also propose a prospective implementation checklist for regulators and endoscopy units evaluating emerging systems, and a prioritized five-year research agenda covering pathway-defined trials, representative datasets, human-factors safeguards, and post-deployment monitoring aligned with contemporary AI reporting standards.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Sri Harsha Boppana, Aditya Chandrashekar, Venkata Sunkesula
Quelle
Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2689-7164
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Sri Harsha Boppana, Aditya Chandrashekar, Venkata Sunkesula (2026). From hype to clinical translation: A tiered, readiness-based framework for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.37126/aige.121109
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON