EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Artificial intelligence for inflammatory bowel disease dysplasia detection: Current evidence and future directions

Ritesh Bhandari, Jack Gartlan, Philip Oppong, Puneet Chhabra

Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

There is increasing interest in using artificial intelligence (AI) in the detection of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the application of AI in this context is limited by dataset shift, lack of validation, and bias. The purpose of this review was to examine the role of AI in the detection of IBD-associated dysplasia through three different themes: Comparative performance, mechanisms of failure, and pathways for safe clinical application. Retrospective, prospective, and multicenter studies demonstrate that AI systems trained on non-IBD data perform poorly in inflamed colons, while IBD-specific AI models provide improved accuracy, however, still experience gaps in generalizability. Various biases like selection, annotation, device, and reporting biases which are further amplified by mismatch between training and deployment environments, undermine the reliability of AI and contribute to potential inequities in care. Practical approaches to improve the reliability and fairness of AI include multicenter IBD-focused datasets, consensus labelling, multimodal architectures, and structured post-deployment monitoring. By framing “beyond dataset shift” as an overarching concept, this review provides a framework for the development of methodologically rigorous, bias-aware AI that will support rather than undermine the prevention of colorectal cancer in IBD.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Ritesh Bhandari, Jack Gartlan, Philip Oppong, Puneet Chhabra
Quelle
Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2689-7164
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Ritesh Bhandari, Jack Gartlan, Philip Oppong, Puneet Chhabra (2026). Artificial intelligence for inflammatory bowel disease dysplasia detection: Current evidence and future directions. Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.37126/aige.118493
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON