EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Marital Fidelity and Digital Infidelity in a UAE University-Affiliated Sample: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study

Dina Tahat, Nouf Awadh Almessabi, Wadha Alshamsi, Alanoud Alshamsi, Khalaf Tahat

Societies · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

This exploratory mixed-methods study examines self-reported perceptions of marital fidelity, marital infidelity, and digital boundary violations among adults recruited through one private university in the United Arab Emirates. Nationality or citizenship and direct socioeconomic indicators were not collected; participants are therefore described as a UAE university-affiliated sample rather than as Emirati or nationally representative. A quantitatively led design combined 156 complete questionnaires with 11 semi-structured interviews. Marital fidelity received very high endorsement (M = 4.50, SD = 0.47), and its observed association with perceived seriousness of infidelity was positive (r = 0.685, p < 0.001). Primary interpretation is limited to the strongly reliable marital-fidelity indicator and the comparatively better-supported seriousness indicator. Findings involving the three-item digital-infidelity index (alpha = 0.481), the two-item forgiveness/restoration index (alpha = 0.534), and the single boundary-clarity item are reported only as secondary exploratory analyses and are not used to support the principal conclusions. Women showed sample-specific differences on fidelity and seriousness, but no result is interpreted as behavioral or moral superiority. The observed correlation between seriousness and digital-infidelity judgments (r = 0.864) indicates substantial overlap; no correction for attenuation is presented because the dimensionality and error structure of the short indices were not established. Interview findings are reported as counts out of 11 rather than percentages. The findings are sample-bound, attitudinal, and hypothesis-generating.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Dina Tahat, Nouf Awadh Almessabi, Wadha Alshamsi, Alanoud Alshamsi, Khalaf Tahat
Quelle
Societies
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2075-4698
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Dina Tahat, Nouf Awadh Almessabi, Wadha Alshamsi, Alanoud Alshamsi, Khalaf Tahat (2026). Marital Fidelity and Digital Infidelity in a UAE University-Affiliated Sample: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study. Societies. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16090285
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1