EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

A Review of Fault Diagnosis and Intelligent Operations and Maintenance for Agricultural Machinery: Fault Mechanisms, Key Technologies, and Practical Recommendations

Yu Zhang, Xingzhu Qian, Ruifan Tang, Chenyu Xi, Tingrui Cui, Zhong Tang

Sensors · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Agricultural machinery operates under variable loads, impacts, dust, and changing soil–crop interactions, allowing faults to propagate through energy, material, information, and control pathways. This qualitative review synthesizes 195 research publications across fault formation, trustworthy diagnosis, prognostics and proactive risk control, maintenance and recovery, and case-based evidence assessment. Empirical findings are reported separately from review-derived recommendations, the authors’ conceptual requirements, and mandatory provisions of applicable standards or law. The literature most consistently supports controlled-fault identification, selected single-machine field monitoring, and localized operational compensation. Evidence is weaker for transfer across machines and seasons, calibrated prognostics, safety authorization, post-repair verification, and fleet-scale deployment. On this basis, the review recommends mission profile-specific fault boundaries, traceable diagnostic outputs, explicit uncertainty and abstention, and risk decisions linked to remaining work and resources. It also proposes a diagnostic passport, risk evolution trajectory, repair-effectiveness label, case-evidence matrix, and closed-loop repair workflow as review-level organizing constructs. No included study continuously followed the same machine or fleet through diagnosis, prognosis, authorization, maintenance, acceptance, and feedback; the framework therefore connects evidence-supported stages theoretically rather than claiming end-to-end validation.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Yu Zhang, Xingzhu Qian, Ruifan Tang, Chenyu Xi, Tingrui Cui, Zhong Tang
Quelle
Sensors
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
1424-8220
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Yu Zhang, Xingzhu Qian, Ruifan Tang, Chenyu Xi, Tingrui Cui, Zhong Tang (2026). A Review of Fault Diagnosis and Intelligent Operations and Maintenance for Agricultural Machinery: Fault Mechanisms, Key Technologies, and Practical Recommendations. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26175679
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1