EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Auricular Reconstruction Following Traumatic Amputation: A Historical Review and Contemporary Treatment Algorithm

Benedikt Fuchs, Vanessa Lucksch, Constanze Kuhlmann, Irene Mesas Aranda, Nikolaus Thierfelder, Sinan Mert, Paul Severin Wiggenhauser

Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background: Traumatic auricular amputation represents a rare but complex reconstructive challenge, and numerous surgical techniques have been developed over the past century to optimize functional and aesthetic outcomes. This historical review examines current auricular reattachment and replantation strategies by comparing established surgical techniques for traumatic auricular amputation. Methods: A historical literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify relevant case reports on auricular reconstruction following amputation, dating from 1898 to the present. Eligible studies were reviewed according to the surgical technique used: composite graft reattachment, local flap, pocket techniques, rib cartilage reconstruction, microsurgical replantation, and tissue engineering. Key milestones were documented chronologically and visualized in a timeline. Results: A total of six major reconstructive approaches were identified in the literature, highlighting the historical evolution of auricular replantation methods from 1898 to 2018. Compiled data were visualized to underscore the procedural development and categorize surgical innovations over time. Conclusions: This review presents a synthesized treatment algorithm that integrates historical context and modern adaptations of auricular replantation techniques. The integrated approach provides a structured framework for managing auricular amputations and promotes standardized practices to optimize functional and aesthetic outcomes in auricular reconstructive surgery.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Benedikt Fuchs, Vanessa Lucksch, Constanze Kuhlmann, Irene Mesas Aranda, Nikolaus Thierfelder, Sinan Mert, Paul Severin Wiggenhauser
Quelle
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2077-0383
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Benedikt Fuchs, Vanessa Lucksch, Constanze Kuhlmann, Irene Mesas Aranda, Nikolaus Thierfelder, Sinan Mert, Paul Severin Wiggenhauser (2026). Auricular Reconstruction Following Traumatic Amputation: A Historical Review and Contemporary Treatment Algorithm. Journal of Clinical Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15186942
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1