Vollständiger Abstract
Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?
Background/Objectives: Transaxillary access (TAx) is an established alternative to transfemoral access (TF) for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with unfavorable iliofemoral anatomy. While TAx-TAVI has been increasingly adopted at experienced centers, propensity score-matched comparative data with VARC-3 endpoint definitions are scarce, and most existing series originate from Western European cohorts. We aimed to address this gap by reporting outcomes from a propensity-matched TAx versus TF cohort using VARC-3 endpoints, contributing contemporary data from a high-volume Turkish center with established alternative access expertise. Methods: Among 2389 consecutive TAVI procedures screened between January 2016 and December 2024, 291 patients with complete data were included. After stratification by access route (TAx n = 51; TF n = 240) and exclusion of one TAx patient with missing covariates, 1:2 greedy nearest-neighbor propensity score matching was performed using nine covariates. The final cohort comprised 150 patients (50 TAx, 100 TF). All outcomes were defined per VARC-3 criteria. Results: All nine covariates achieved standardized mean differences
Bibliografischer Nachweis
Publikationsdaten
- Autor:innen
- Kemal Eşref Erdoğan, Emrah Uğuz, Mehmet Akif Erdöl, Muhammet Fethi Sağlam, Murat Yücel, Altay Alili, Hüseyin Bayram, Mehmet Murat Yiğitbaşı, Burak Kardeşler, Kamuran Kalkan
- Quelle
- Diagnostics
- Publikation
- 2026-01-01
- Band / Ausgabe
- Nicht angegeben
- Seiten
- Nicht angegeben
- ISSN / ISBN
- 2075-4418
- Zitationen
- 0 laut Crossref
- Referenzen
- 0 hinterlegt
Zitieren
Zitierfähiger Nachweis
Kemal Eşref Erdoğan, Emrah Uğuz, Mehmet Akif Erdöl, Muhammet Fethi Sağlam, Murat Yücel, Altay Alili, Hüseyin Bayram, Mehmet Murat Yiğitbaşı, Burak Kardeşler, Kamuran Kalkan (2026). Transaxillary Versus Transfemoral Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Using VARC-3 Endpoints. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16172855
Kontext
Themen, Förderung und Nutzung
Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1