EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00132

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2000

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

<h4>Background</h4>Inappropriate urine testing and antibiotic prescribing are common challenges in nursing home residents evaluated for suspected urinary tract infection (UTI). This study evaluated urine testing practices, microbiological findings, and antibiotic prescribing in two French nursing homes.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective observational study of 102 nursing home residents evaluated for suspected UTI between June 2024 and April 2026. Demographic, clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic data were retrospectively collected. Antibiotic prescriptions were assessed according to French Infectious Diseases Society (SPILF) criteria. Descriptive analyses were performed.<h4>Results</h4>The mean age was 83.0 ± 8.3 years, and 71 (69.6%) residents were women. Urine dipstick testing was performed in 95 (93.1%) residents and was positive in 87 (91.6%). Urine cultures were performed in 87 residents, of whom 60 (69.0%) had positive cultures. ESBL-producing Enterobacterales were identified in 31 (51.7%) positive urine cultures. Twenty-seven residents received empirical antibiotics despite a subsequently negative urine culture, and 42.5% of antibiotic prescriptions were classified as inappropriate according to SPILF criteria. Fosfomycin was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic. Non-specific geriatric manifestations were common, highlighting the diagnostic difficulty of distinguishing symptomatic UTI from asymptomatic bacteriuria.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Inappropriate urine testing and antibiotic prescribing were frequent in this nursing home population. Positive urine cultures, including those yielding ESBL-producing organisms, should not be interpreted in isolation as evidence of symptomatic infection or an indication for antibiotic therapy. Strengthening diagnostic stewardship and adherence to clinical criteria may reduce unnecessary urine testing and antimicrobial exposure while promoting appropriate antibiotic use.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2000-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
14 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2000). 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00132. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1931709
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON