EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Optimising feedback provision and literacy in medical training: linking theory to practice

Isaac K. S. Ng, Wilson G. W. Goh, Norman H. Y. Lin, Ming Ying Gan, Desmond B. Teo, Li Feng Tan, Ying Liang Low, Marion Margaret Aw, Adrian C. L. Kee

Frontiers in Medicine · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Feedback is a cornerstone of all competency-based medical education and training programmes, where learners receive feedback from preceptors on various aspects of clinical performance to attain desired outcomes. However, feedback processes are often suboptimal due to lack of training and expertise of the preceptors in effective feedback provision leading to ineffective feedback that is lacking in timeliness, substance, actionability or palatability. In addition, inadequate feedback literacy in terms of poor self-awareness, affective overlay or lack of motivation to change further limits receptivity to constructive criticisms. In this article, we provide an educational primer on optimising feedback in medical training from both perspectives of feedback provision and reception/literacy. Through a review of common barriers to feedback identified in medical education and practice, as well as pre-existing models of feedback, we developed a novel, practical “reflect-analyse-emote-support” (RAES) framework that could be used for giving feedback in medical training, which not only retains traditional principles and learner-centered structures of feedback, but also incorporates cognitive-behavioral strategies that help navigate natural intuitive, emotive resistance to constructive/negative feedback.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Isaac K. S. Ng, Wilson G. W. Goh, Norman H. Y. Lin, Ming Ying Gan, Desmond B. Teo, Li Feng Tan, Ying Liang Low, Marion Margaret Aw, Adrian C. L. Kee
Quelle
Frontiers in Medicine
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2296-858X
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Isaac K. S. Ng, Wilson G. W. Goh, Norman H. Y. Lin, Ming Ying Gan, Desmond B. Teo, Li Feng Tan, Ying Liang Low, Marion Margaret Aw, Adrian C. L. Kee (2026). Optimising feedback provision and literacy in medical training: linking theory to practice. Frontiers in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1883679
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1