A comparative study of short-term intensive and prolonged low-intensity simulation training on clinical competence among medical students

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Introduction Clinical simulation training is widely used to improve procedural proficiency and patient safety; however, the relative effectiveness of different training schedules remains uncertain. This study compared clinical competence outcomes associated with short-term intensive and prolonged distributed simulation training among medical students. Methods This prospective, non-randomized comparative cohort study included 48 fifth-year medical students. Based on their preferences, participants selected either a 15-day intensive simulation program (Group A, n = 24; approximately 8 h/day) or a 5-month distributed simulation program (Group B, n = 24; no more than 2 h/day). The total training duration was comparable between the groups. After training, both groups participated in team-based clinical skills competitions. Outcomes included scores from the Shandong Provincial College Student Medical Technology Skills Competition and structured post-training assessments of specialized knowledge, clinical skills, teamwork, emergency response capacity, and integrated professionalism completed by instructors and students. Results Group A achieved higher competition scores than Group B in basic surgical procedures, internal medicine procedures, gynecological and pediatric procedures, emergency medical skills, and physician-patient communication skills (all p < 0.05). The between-group difference in comprehensive case-analysis skills was not statistically significant ( p = 0.065). Group A also received higher instructor ratings and reported higher self-assessment scores across all evaluated domains than Group B (all p < 0.05). Discussion Participation in short-term intensive simulation training was associated with better immediate competition performance and more favorable instructor and student ratings than participation in prolonged distributed training. However, because group allocation was preference-based and potentially important baseline variables were unavailable, the findings do not establish causal superiority or long-term benefits of intensive training. Concentrated, feedback-rich simulation may be useful when immediate technical and team performance is prioritized, but randomized studies incorporating retention and clinical-transfer outcomes are needed.