EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Conceptualising archival heritage management in Jordan: policy, digitisation, and public access

Ayman ALAMR

Scientia fructuosa · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

This study examines the transformation of archival governance from a traditional protec­tion-oriented paradigm to an integrated mana­gement framework, with a specific focus on the Jordanian context. While archival institutions have historically prioritised the safeguarding and preservation of documentary materials, contem­porary developments in digital technology, gover­nance models, and public expectations necessitate a broader and more strategic approach. A hypothesis is proposed that leads to an integrated model for managing the efficiency, accessibility, and public value of archival institutions. Adopting a qualitative analytical methodology, the research draws on international legal frameworks, heritage management guide­lines, and archival theory to assess the conceptual and structural evolution of docu­mentary heritage governance. A comparative analytical framework is employed to identify the key differences between protection-based and mana­gement-oriented models, particularly in relation to policy coherence, digitisation strategies, and public accessibility. The findings reveal that archival governance in Jordan remains largely influenced by custodial practices, with emerging yet fragmented digitisation initiatives and limited structured public engagement mechanisms. The study highlights the absence of comprehensive management plans and coordinated national digitisation policies as critical gaps. The paper argues that effective archival heritage management in Jordan requires the integration of three interdependent pillars: strategic policy development, structured digitisation frameworks, and inclusive access mechanisms. By aligning national practices with international standards–particularly UNESCOʼs Memory of the World Programme–Jordan can reposition its archives as dynamic cultural assets that contribute to transparency, knowledge produc­tion, and national identity formation in the digital age (UNESCO, 2015)

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Ayman ALAMR
Quelle
Scientia fructuosa
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2786-7986, 2786-7978
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Ayman ALAMR (2026). Conceptualising archival heritage management in Jordan: policy, digitisation, and public access. Scientia fructuosa. https://doi.org/10.31617/1.2026%28168%2902
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1