EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Dosimetric Impact of Deformable Image Registration versus Simple Summation in Multi-Fraction HDR Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer under Standard Protocol

Chitchaya Suwanraksa, Bheampos Rojkitjanuruk, Tanapat Suwanpan, Korrawit Pruegsanusak

Journal of Health Science and Medical Research · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Objective: In high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer, cumulative dose is commonly estimated using simple summation (SS) of dose–volume histogram parameters, assuming high-dose regions remain spatially consistent across fractions. Deformable image registration (DIR) offers an alternative approach that accounts for interfractional anatomical variations. This study compared the dosimetric outcomes of SS and DIR under standardized clinical protocols.Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 54 patients with cervical cancer treated with four-fraction intracavitary brachytherapy using standardized applicators and a bladder-filling protocol with CT-based planning. Cumulative doses to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), bladder, and rectum were calculated using both SS and DIR, aligned using applicator geometry. DIR accuracy was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA), Hausdorff distance (HD), and Jaccard Index.Results: DIR yielded significantly lower accumulated HR-CTV doses across all the evaluated parameters (percentage differences were 8.2%, 6.0%, and 3.7% for D98, D90, and D50, respectively; all p-value

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Chitchaya Suwanraksa, Bheampos Rojkitjanuruk, Tanapat Suwanpan, Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Quelle
Journal of Health Science and Medical Research
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2630-0559, 2586-9981
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Chitchaya Suwanraksa, Bheampos Rojkitjanuruk, Tanapat Suwanpan, Korrawit Pruegsanusak (2026). Dosimetric Impact of Deformable Image Registration versus Simple Summation in Multi-Fraction HDR Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer under Standard Protocol. Journal of Health Science and Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20261411
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1