EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

An Iterative Framework for AI Adoption in the Public Sector: Insights from a Swiss Case Study

Václav Pechtor

JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

In the step from prototype to the productive, the sustainable use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications remains a significant challenge. This creates a demand for frameworks that guide organisations and help to bridge this gap in specific domains. This study validates the Adoption Framework for AI in the Public Sector (AFAIPS) by examining its application in a Swiss AI chatbot project for healthcare cost verification, addressing how an iterative framework can be used to navigate public sector constraints. Using a detailed single case study within an Elaborated Action Design Research (EADR) setting, this research recorded a 34-week AI chatbot implementation over eleven iterations, drawing evidence from project documentation and user interviews. The findings show that AFAIPS effectively guided the project through its adoption phases, enabling user-driven development and flexible adjustments. Iterative prototyping and continuous feedback were essential for handling public sector limitations and technical uncertainties. Key results included organisational learning, such as the development of "AI-ready" documentation, and strategic changes like planning for external Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) support to address internal capability gaps. This study provides empirical validation of AFAIPS in public healthcare administration, offering new insights into how an integrated framework — combining the Diffusion of Innovations theory (DOI) with Design Thinking (DT), Lean Startup (LS), and MLOps connects theory with the practicalities of government AI implementation, to improve public value. For public managers and policymakers, this research offers a validated roadmap and practical strategies for stakeholder engagement, iterative development, and agile management to guide digital transformation and AI governance.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Václav Pechtor
Quelle
JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2075-9517
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Václav Pechtor (2026). An Iterative Framework for AI Adoption in the Public Sector: Insights from a Swiss Case Study. JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v18i1.1158
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1