EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

THE STATUS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE DEVELOPER COMMUNITY: A LITERATURE REVIEW OF STATISTICS, TRENDS, AND EXPECTATIONS CURRENT ADOPTION PATTERNS, EMERGING TRENDS, AND FUTURE OUTLOOK (2023–2026)

Stefano Colafranceschi

ShodhAI: Journal of Artificial Intelligence · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Artificial intelligence (AI) has moved from an experimental novelty to a structural component of professional software development within roughly three years. This literature review synthesizes evidence from four large-sample industry surveys: the Stack Overflow. (2025) (n = 49,009), the Google Cloud. (2025) (n > 5,000), the JetBrains State of the Developer Ecosystem 2025 (n = 24,534), and Github. (2025) platform telemetry. This study presents a targeted set of peer-reviewed and preprint academic studies, including five randomized controlled trials, to assess the current status, dominant trends, and near-term outlook of AI adoption in the global developer community. Convergent survey evidence indicates that 84% of developers now use or plan to use AI tools (up from 76% in 2024), with 51% of professional developers using AI daily and adoption reaching 90% in DORA’s sample. Despite this, trust in AI accuracy has fallen to 29–33%, down from roughly 40% in prior years, and positive favorability has declined from 72% to 60%, producing a well-documented adoption–trust paradox. Unlike prior industry-report syntheses, this review foregrounds contradictory causal evidence: while an early randomized controlled trial found AI assistance produced a 55.8% speed gain on a scoped, unfamiliar task, the most methodologically rigorous field experiment to date, a 2025 trial by METR, found that AI access slowed experienced open-source developers by 19% on real maintenance work, even though those same developers believed AI had made them faster both before and after the study. Additional peer-reviewed evidence links AI-assisted coding to reduced code security, rising code churn and duplication, and measurable deficits in skill formation among less experienced programmers. The review concludes that AI adoption is now unambiguous and structural, but that its net effect on software quality, security, and the profession’s skill base remains contested, and appears to depend more on task complexity, codebase familiarity, and developer experience than on the technology in isolation.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Stefano Colafranceschi
Quelle
ShodhAI: Journal of Artificial Intelligence
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
3048-9245, 3108-1940
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Stefano Colafranceschi (2026). THE STATUS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE DEVELOPER COMMUNITY: A LITERATURE REVIEW OF STATISTICS, TRENDS, AND EXPECTATIONS CURRENT ADOPTION PATTERNS, EMERGING TRENDS, AND FUTURE OUTLOOK (2023–2026). ShodhAI: Journal of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhai.v3.i2.2026.103
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON