EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Consumer Ratings of Over-the-Counter Online Scar Treatments

Katelyn Stenger, Amanda Tran, Emily Ahern, Shirley Cheng, Loren Yamamoto

SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background Scars affect nearly 100 million people annually, with more individuals seeking over thecounter (OTC) products online. Silicone is currently recommended by the American Academy ofDermatology, while the efficacy of other popular ingredients lack strong evidence. This study utilizedAmazon to assess the most highly rated features of scar removal products described by online consumersin 2022 and 2024. Case Presentation Amazon.com was searched using “scar removal/treatment” in December 2022 andagain in September–December 2024. Products with >50 ratings were included, and duplicates wereexcluded. A total of 170 products were analyzed. Data on form, ingredient, dermatologistrecommendation, price, and ratings were collected. Individual rating distributions were estimated frompercentages and total ratings. Discussion We reviewed 170 products of which 112 were silicone and 12 were vitamin E products. 93were gels/creams and 53 were tape/adhesives. There were 440,087 individual customer ratings. Of theingredients, vitamin E products (p

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Katelyn Stenger, Amanda Tran, Emily Ahern, Shirley Cheng, Loren Yamamoto
Quelle
SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2574-1624
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Katelyn Stenger, Amanda Tran, Emily Ahern, Shirley Cheng, Loren Yamamoto (2026). Consumer Ratings of Over-the-Counter Online Scar Treatments. SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine. https://doi.org/10.25251/2axabe39
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1