EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr 10/10Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

A multicenter prospective validation cohort does not support the use of kidney/psoas [18F]FDG uptake in the diagnosis of kidney allograft subclinical rejection

Pierre Lovinfosse, Antoine Bouquegneau, Annick Massart, Lissa Pipeleers, Catherine Bonvoisin, Laurens Carp, Hendrik Everaert, Alexandre Jadoul, Amélie Dendooven, Caroline Geers, Stéphanie Grosch, Pauline Erpicum, Rachel Hellemans, Laurence Seidel, Laurent Weekers, Roland Hustinx, François Jouret

PLOS One · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background Subclinical kidney allograft acute rejection (SCR) corresponds to “the unexpected histological evidence of acute rejection in a stable patient”. The diagnosis of SCR relies on surveillance biopsy. Positron emission tomography (PET/CT) after injection of F 18 -fluorodeoxyglucose ([ 18 F]FDG) has been proposed as a non-invasive screening approach. In the present multicenter prospective study, we assess the diagnostic yield [ 18 F]FDGPET/CT to rule out SCR in stable KTR at 3 months post KTx. Methods From 01/2021–03/2025, we prospectively combined surveillance biopsy and [ 18 F]FDGPET/CT at ~3 months post transplantation in adult kidney transplant recipients from 4 independent imaging centers. The mean standardized uptake value (mSUV) was measured in kidney cortex and referenced as a ratio to psoas muscle mSUV (mSUVR). Results Our multicenter cohort of 185 patients was categorized according to the Banff-2022 classification as: normal (n = 158); borderline (n = 18); SCR (n = 9, including 6 T-cell-mediated rejection and 3 microvascular inflammation). No significant correlation was observed between the mSUVR and ti score (R = 0.032, p-value = 0.67). The mSUVR reached 2.33 [1.97–2.93], 2.71 [2.50–3.33] and 2.42 [2.27–3.14] in normal, borderline and SCR groups, respectively. In multivariate models stratified by center, the risk of non-normal histology (n = 27, including borderline and SCR) increased with donor age (OR=1.05 [1.01–1.1], p = 0.02) but not with the mSUVR (OR=4.11 [0.91–18.48], p = 0.07). The Z-score of mSUVR was significantly associated with the risk of non-normal histology (OR=1.542 [1.02–2.33, p = 0.04). The risk of biopsy-proven SCR (n = 9) was not significantly associated with mSUVR. Conclusions The mSUVR of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT does not reliably rule out SCR on surveillance biopsy.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Pierre Lovinfosse, Antoine Bouquegneau, Annick Massart, Lissa Pipeleers, Catherine Bonvoisin, Laurens Carp, Hendrik Everaert, Alexandre Jadoul, Amélie Dendooven, Caroline Geers, Stéphanie Grosch, Pauline Erpicum, Rachel Hellemans, Laurence Seidel, Laurent Weekers, Roland Hustinx, François Jouret
Quelle
PLOS One
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
1932-6203
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Pierre Lovinfosse, Antoine Bouquegneau, Annick Massart, Lissa Pipeleers, Catherine Bonvoisin, Laurens Carp, Hendrik Everaert, Alexandre Jadoul, Amélie Dendooven, Caroline Geers, Stéphanie Grosch, Pauline Erpicum, Rachel Hellemans, Laurence Seidel, Laurent Weekers, Roland Hustinx, François Jouret (2026). A multicenter prospective validation cohort does not support the use of kidney/psoas [18F]FDG uptake in the diagnosis of kidney allograft subclinical rejection. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345426
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1