EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.1177/1056789514562152

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2015

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

The shortage of experienced nurses within the global workforce has resulted in healthcare systems increasingly relying on inexperienced nurses to meet workforce demands. These demands include the mentorship of undergraduate nursing students by newly graduated registered nurses. However, there is little understanding of how new graduate nurses filling mentorship roles impacts on students' clinical placement experience. The study explored pre-registration nursing students' experiences of mentorship by new graduate registered nurses (NGRNs). The study used a qualitative descriptive design underpinned by naturalistic inquiry. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with pre-registration nursing students who were mentored by NGRNs. Twelve participants were recruited via social media using purposive and snowball sampling until data sufficiency was achieved. Braun and Clarke's Thematic Analysis framework guided data analysis. Interviews generated three themes and five sub-themes: Theme one - More than placement: A sense of belonging and included two sub-themes (i) Breaking the ice: Being welcoming and approachable and (ii) Cultivating empathy and emotional connection: She never judged me. Theme two - Pedagogical approaches of NGRNs in teaching with sub-themes (i) Collaborative learning in the clinical setting: We are learning together; (ii) The role of time and patience: Do not rush, take your time and (iii) Building confidence and promoting independence: She allowed me to be hands on. Theme three - Barriers to effective student learning. NGRNs formed a positive relationship in the clinical setting by being welcoming, approachable and inclusive with students. This study prompts a reconsideration of established assumptions that experienced mentors provide the most effective mentorship. Relational attributes enhance students' learning and confidence, highlighting the need to re-evaluate current mentorship models and recognise the positive impact these mentors may have on the future nursing workforce.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2015-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2015). 10.1177/1056789514562152. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871261466811
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON