EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Crossref · journal-article

Ethical issues in digital mental health delivery: a comprehensive scoping review of global challenges

Nurul Ain Ain Mohd Mohd Daud, Hapsah Md Yusof, Norazani Ahmad, Fauziah Mohd Sa’ad, Nurul Hasyimah Mat Rani, Pau Kee, Nur Shuhana Mohd Sansuddin

International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences · 2026 · Band 15 · Ausgabe 3 · S. 911

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Digital technologies are becoming increasingly integrated into mental health counselling. While expanding the boundaries of service provision, these technologies have also raised numerous ethical challenges that urgently need clarification. This study conducts a scoping review following the standardized methodology developed by Arksey and O’Malley. It identifies five core ethical challenges facing practitioners: privacy and data security; informed consent and autonomy; service accessibility and equality; algorithmic fairness and bias mitigation; and inclusiveness and equity. Existing comparative analyses show that Western countries, including the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK), have mature digital mental health regulatory frameworks. In contrast, non-Western countries generally face gaps in legal protections, which have created a global ethical divide. Artificial intelligence (AI)-related risks, such as algorithmic bias and lack of transparency, further exacerbate these problems. The study calls on policymakers to improve relevant regulatory frameworks and requires practitioners to receive specialized ethical training.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nurul Ain Ain Mohd Mohd Daud, Hapsah Md Yusof, Norazani Ahmad, Fauziah Mohd Sa’ad, Nurul Hasyimah Mat Rani, Pau Kee, Nur Shuhana Mohd Sansuddin
Quelle
International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences
Publikation
2026-09-01
Band / Ausgabe
15 / 3
Seiten
911
ISSN / ISBN
2722-2594, 2252-8814
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Nurul Ain Ain Mohd Mohd Daud, Hapsah Md Yusof, Norazani Ahmad, Fauziah Mohd Sa’ad, Nurul Hasyimah Mat Rani, Pau Kee, Nur Shuhana Mohd Sansuddin (2026). Ethical issues in digital mental health delivery: a comprehensive scoping review of global challenges. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences, 15 (3), 911. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v15.i3.pp911-920
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1