EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Shared principles, local practice: an international survey of child death review systems

Merve Tosyali, Jeanine Young, Joanna Jane Garstang

BMJ Paediatrics Open · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Objective Child death review (CDR) is the multiprofessional review of child deaths aiming to identify causes, risk factors and learning, with the aim of improving services and preventing future deaths. The objective of this study was to determine the range of current CDR practice internationally. Design This study used a descriptive comparative survey design to determine similarities and differences between CDR practices in different countries. A secure online questionnaire was developed by the CDR working group of the International Society for the Study and Prevention of Perinatal and Infant Death and distributed via international professional networks. Setting Professionals working in CDR in any country globally, contacted via email. Participants 27 professionals from 19 different countries participated in the study. To ensure data consistency, duplicate responses from the same region within countries were combined. A total of 20 responses from regions within 13 different countries were included. Outcomes Key measures included legal status of CDR systems, family involvement in CDR, legal protection for professionals, multidisciplinary team structure and CDR inclusion criteria. Results CDR was identified in 13 countries; 5 describing national CDR programmes and 8 with regional programmes. The aim of all CDR programmes was to prevent future deaths. Laws mandating CDR existed in 15 regions or countries; areas without legislative support reported challenges in conducting CDR. Parental involvement in CDR varied considerably between regions: six required parental consent for reviews, while nine did not inform parents about reviews. In 10 regions, all child deaths regardless of cause were included in CDR, while other programmes reviewed only selected deaths. In seven regions, professionals were provided with legal protection from malpractice claims to enable participation in the CDR. Conclusions Common principles underpin effective CDR, providing a foundation for locally adapted approaches to improve systems and prevent future deaths.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Merve Tosyali, Jeanine Young, Joanna Jane Garstang
Quelle
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2399-9772
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Merve Tosyali, Jeanine Young, Joanna Jane Garstang (2026). Shared principles, local practice: an international survey of child death review systems. BMJ Paediatrics Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2026-005019
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1