EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

The Effect of Professionalism, Evidence‐Based Practice and Clinical Decision‐Making Levels on the Perception of Individualised Care Among Intensive Care Nurses

Ebubekir Kaplan, Özkan Sir, Muhammet Faruk Yiğit, Musa Ekremen

Nursing in Critical Care · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

ABSTRACT Background In intensive care units, where complex patient needs require evidence‐based clinical decision‐making, individualised care is regarded as one of the cornerstones of high‐quality nursing practice. Aim This study aimed to examine the relationships between professional values, attitudes towards evidence‐based nursing, clinical decision‐making and perceptions of individualised care among intensive care nurses. Study Design A cross‐sectional descriptive study design was employed. Methods Data were collected from intensive care nurses using validated instruments assessing professional values, attitudes towards evidence‐based nursing, clinical decision‐making, and perceptions of individualised care. Results Significant positive correlations were found among all study variables ( p < 0.001). Evidence‐based nursing emerged as the strongest predictor of individualised care (β = 0.444, p < 0.001), followed by professional values (β = 0.165, p < 0.001) and clinical decision‐making (β = 0.112, p = 0.020). The final model explained 35.9% of the variance. Nurses with postgraduate education and longer ICU experience demonstrated higher scores across all variables. Conclusions Attitudes towards evidence‐based nursing were strongly associated with perceptions of individualised care among intensive care nurses. Professional values and clinical decision‐making also contributed significantly to this relationship. Relevance to Clinical Practice Strengthening nurses' participation in evidence‐based practice can support the delivery of better individualised care in intensive care settings.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Ebubekir Kaplan, Özkan Sir, Muhammet Faruk Yiğit, Musa Ekremen
Quelle
Nursing in Critical Care
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
1362-1017, 1478-5153
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Ebubekir Kaplan, Özkan Sir, Muhammet Faruk Yiğit, Musa Ekremen (2026). The Effect of Professionalism, Evidence‐Based Practice and Clinical Decision‐Making Levels on the Perception of Individualised Care Among Intensive Care Nurses. Nursing in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70639
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1 · Lizenz 2