EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Efficacy and Safety of Mechanical Insufflation–Exsufflation in Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Zhiqun Liu, Guiling Liao, Hui Wen, Xiaotong Han, Maiying Fan, Shuzhen Mao, Xiaohua Liu, Huan Wan

Nursing in Critical Care · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

ABSTRACT Background Mechanical insufflation–exsufflation (MI–E) is increasingly used in invasively ventilated adults in the intensive care unit (ICU), yet its therapeutic efficacy and safety remain uncertain due to inconsistent evidence. Aim To synthesize evidence on the clinical efficacy and safety of MI–E in this population and to examine methodological and clinical heterogeneity underlying reported outcomes. Study Design A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized studies (including RCTs and randomized crossover trials), conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool. Results Five randomized controlled trials involving 310 patients were included. Meta‐analysis showed that mechanical insufflation–exsufflation (MI–E) significantly increased sputum clearance (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.32–0.93; p < 0.00011; I 2 = 38%) without affecting oxygenation (MD = 0.28, 95% CI, −0.53 to 1.09; p = 0.50; I 2 = 9%). Data on respiratory mechanics, ventilation duration and ICU stay could not be pooled. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions MI–E significantly improves sputum clearance in invasively ventilated critically ill adults, with no severe adverse events reported in the included studies. Its effects on other outcomes remain inconclusive due to limited data and heterogeneity. Standardized protocols and larger trials are needed. Relevance to Clinical Practice Clinicians may consider MI–E as an adjunct for respiratory secretion management. Application should be guided by structured patient assessment and individualized parameter adjustment. Future research should standardize interventions and target well‐defined patient subgroups to inform clear practice guidelines. Trial Registration The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, with registration number CRD42023403299

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Zhiqun Liu, Guiling Liao, Hui Wen, Xiaotong Han, Maiying Fan, Shuzhen Mao, Xiaohua Liu, Huan Wan
Quelle
Nursing in Critical Care
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
1362-1017, 1478-5153
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Zhiqun Liu, Guiling Liao, Hui Wen, Xiaotong Han, Maiying Fan, Shuzhen Mao, Xiaohua Liu, Huan Wan (2026). Efficacy and Safety of Mechanical Insufflation–Exsufflation in Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nursing in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70598
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1 · Lizenz 2