EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.1016/s1541-9800(05)70734-1

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2000

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

<h4>Aim</h4>To explore nurses' perceptions of how digitalisation influences the delivery of person-centred fundamental care, specifically regarding opportunities, challenges and changes associated with this transformation.<h4>Design</h4>A qualitative descriptive study.<h4>Methods</h4>Semi-structured interviews with 25 purposeful sampling of clinical nurses and nurse managers in four hospitals in Italy, where digitalisation was in its initial stages. Data were analysed using content analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Three main themes illustrate a dynamic tension between digitalisation as a potential enabler of person-centred fundamental care and a potential threat: (a) 'Expanding nurses' capacity towards fundamental care' describes how digital technologies support monitoring, safety and workflow optimisation, potentially freeing time for direct care; (b) 'Being at risk of being taken away from patients' highlights concerns that increased reliance on digitalisation changes nurse-patient relationships and shifts clinical judgement towards technology-driven processes and (c) 'Building nurses' capability to implement digital Fundamentals of Care' explores how digitalisation's implications are shaped by generational experiences in care delivery.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Digitalisation has the potential to strengthen the integration of physical, psychosocial and relational needs. However, the implementation context, representing the third dimension of the Fundamentals of Care (FoC) framework, appears to moderate both its positive and negative implications for nursing practice. Its influence therefore depends on how digital technologies are embedded within person-centred nursing care.<h4>Implications for profession/patient care</h4>Digitalisation is reshaping nursing practice, requiring technological innovation and person-centred care to evolve together. Ensuring that digital systems remain aligned with the principles of FoC will be essential for preserving nursing's relational essence while realising the potential of digitalisation.<h4>Impact</h4>To ensure digitalisation enhances rather than undermines person-centred fundamental care, investment is needed in nursing workforce capacity, education that integrates digital competencies with the FoC framework, and organisational strategies that protect the nurse-patient relationship.<h4>Reporting method</h4>Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.<h4>Patient or public contribution</h4>Participants were nurses and they were involved in the data collection.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2000-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2000). 10.1016/s1541-9800(05)70734-1. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70734
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1 · Lizenz 2