EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr 7/7Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Flap Versus Tunneling for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With FDBA and i‐ PRF : A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Maryam Heidaryzadeh, Mohammad Mohammadi, Nazila Lashkarizadeh, Mahsa Kalantari Khandani

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

ABSTRACT Aim This study evaluated the efficacy of conventional flap and tunneling techniques for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using freeze‐dried bone allograft (FDBA) particles combined with injectable platelet‐rich fibrin (i‐PRF). Materials and Methods Forty‐five patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups ( n = 15 each): conventional flap (CF), tunneling with membrane (TM), or tunneling without membrane (TnM). Preoperative ridge width was measured via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). All augmentation procedures incorporated FDBA and i‐PRF; an absorbable collagen membrane was applied in the CF and TM groups. Follow‐up assessments, including CBCT imaging and histomorphometric analysis, were conducted 6 months postoperatively. For normally distributed data, ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test and paired samples t ‐test were applied. Non‐normally distributed data were analyzed using Kruskal‐Wallis, Mann–Whitney U , and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests. Results Statistical analysis was performed on 43 patients. All groups demonstrated an increase in ridge width after 6 months. At the 2 mm level, the mean width gain was 1.28 mm (95% CI: 0.17 to 2.40) in the TM group, 2.85 mm (95% CI: 1.80 to 3.89) in the TnM group, and 1.95 mm (95% CI: 1.07 to 2.83) in the CF group. However, statistical analysis revealed no significant intergroup variation ( p > 0.05). Histomorphometric assessments similarly demonstrated comparable outcomes across all groups, with no statistically significant differences observed ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, the tunneling technique, regardless of membrane use, appears to be a clinically viable alternative to the conventional flap method for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation. However, further studies with longer follow‐up periods are required to substantiate these findings. Trial Registration: irct.behdasht.gov.ir identifier: IRCT 20101204005305N21

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Maryam Heidaryzadeh, Mohammad Mohammadi, Nazila Lashkarizadeh, Mahsa Kalantari Khandani
Quelle
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
1523-0899, 1708-8208
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Maryam Heidaryzadeh, Mohammad Mohammadi, Nazila Lashkarizadeh, Mahsa Kalantari Khandani (2026). Flap Versus Tunneling for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With FDBA and i‐ PRF : A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70179
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1 · Lizenz 2