EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.1111/acn.v9999.9999

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2000

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

INTRODUCTION: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly recognised as integral to high-quality neonatal research, yet practical guidance on its implementation remains limited. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this paper is to describe the establishment and operation of a Parent Advisory Group (PAG) embedded within a national neonatal medicines feasibility study, including facilitators and barriers for ongoing PPI involvement in research. The second aim is to describe how the group's involvement informed study design, recruitment and retention strategies to optimise the research study. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was undertaken and reported in accordance with the GRIPP2 checklist. Parents with recent neonatal unit experience were recruited through national neonatal networks and institutional PPI platforms. Feedback from meeting transcripts, reflective notes and questionnaires was analysed using an inductive descriptive thematic approach. RESULTS: Seven parents contributed to study materials, recruitment strategies and interpretation of findings through group meetings and asynchronous feedback. Flexible engagement approaches supported participation, although sustaining involvement over time and managing the emotional impact of participation presented challenges. CONCLUSION: Structured and flexible models of engagement, paired with appropriate supports, can support meaningful parental involvement in neonatal research. This study highlights how parental involvement can inform study design, recruitment and retention planning, and strategies for sustaining parent engagement.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2000-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2000). 10.1111/acn.v9999.9999. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.70334
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON