EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Clinical Application of a Neonatal Delirium Screening Tool: A Feasibility Study

Rikke Louise Stenkjaer, Ingrid Egerod, Mala Moszkowicz, Erwin Ista, Gorm Greisen, Lise Aunsholt, Porntiva Poorisrisak, Suzanne Forsyth Herling

Acta Paediatrica · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

ABSTRACT Aims The aims were as follows: (1) to adapt the Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms—Paediatric Delirium (SOS‐PD) screening tool for use in neonates (SOS‐ND), (2) to estimate the accuracy of SOS‐ND (used by nurses) compared to assessment by a child psychiatrist using an adapted version of Vanderbilt Assessment of Delirium in Infants and Children and (3) to compare the outcome of assessments of the child psychiatrist and neonatologists. Methods A descriptive and comparative design was used. An interdisciplinary group adapted the SOS‐PD to develop the SOS‐ND. We compared three assessments done on the same day in hospitalized neonates with postmenstrual age at 35–44 weeks in a Danish level IV neonatal intensive care unit. Results Twenty‐six neonates were assessed and five were diagnosed with delirium by the child psychiatrist. An accuracy of 88% [CI 69.9–97.6] was found between SOS‐ND screenings during the preceding 24 h and the child psychiatrist's assessment. Neonatologists did not positively identify delirium in the 26 neonates. Conclusion The findings suggest that nurses and the child psychiatrist observe the same condition. By contrast, the absence of delirium diagnosed by experienced neonatologists suggests differences in the conceptualization of the underlying neuropsychological condition.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Rikke Louise Stenkjaer, Ingrid Egerod, Mala Moszkowicz, Erwin Ista, Gorm Greisen, Lise Aunsholt, Porntiva Poorisrisak, Suzanne Forsyth Herling
Quelle
Acta Paediatrica
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0803-5253, 1651-2227
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Rikke Louise Stenkjaer, Ingrid Egerod, Mala Moszkowicz, Erwin Ista, Gorm Greisen, Lise Aunsholt, Porntiva Poorisrisak, Suzanne Forsyth Herling (2026). Clinical Application of a Neonatal Delirium Screening Tool: A Feasibility Study. Acta Paediatrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70758
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1 · Lizenz 2