EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Self-reflections on scholarly writing: Strengths, challenges, and growth as doctor of nursing practice students

Sarah E. Keeney, Matthew R. Evans Chelf

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

ABSTRACT Background: Writing is integral to nursing education and the nursing profession, but scholarly writing produced by graduate nursing students is often viewed through a deficit lens. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to capture and describe doctor of nursing practice students' perceptions of their writing strengths and challenges, and to learn from reflections on a writing assignment, to inform graduate faculty and their pedagogy, helping them better understand their student population. Methodology: This study used a qualitative, descriptive approach to review 205 student reflections on writing strengths, challenges, and learning to understand their perspectives on scholarly writing. Results: Varied foundational levels of writing and other academic skills, previous experience, orientations, and attitudes that students bring to writing emerged in these student reflections. Responses were categorized into identity, attitude, resources, style, process, and mechanics. Conclusions: Students expressed resilience, dedication, self-awareness, self-doubt, and uncertainty. Support resources helped students gain confidence and experience. Implications: We should acknowledge the existing skills and resources on which students can build and grow as graduate scholars and writers. We should also not assume that all nurses or graduate nursing students write in an academic or scholarly manner before entering programs; one of the values of this assignment was that it required students to access specialized, writing-specific support. Scaffolding collaboration with existing academic supports, such as writing centers and library resources, can help students identify their strengths and spur development as graduate-level writers.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Sarah E. Keeney, Matthew R. Evans Chelf
Quelle
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2327-6924
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Sarah E. Keeney, Matthew R. Evans Chelf (2026). Self-reflections on scholarly writing: Strengths, challenges, and growth as doctor of nursing practice students. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. https://doi.org/10.1097/jxx.0000000000001355
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON