EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr 10/10Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Effects of Adding a Cross-Link During Single-Level Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases: A Computed Tomography-Based Analysis

Koichiro Shima, Bungo Otsuki, Koichi Murata, Takayoshi Shimizu, Takashi Sono, Shintaro Honda, Masaki Sakamoto, Takaki Yoshiyama, Ryohei Saito, Shuichi Matsuda

Clinical Spine Surgery · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: To evaluate whether adding cross-links during single-level lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) improves fusion rates, segmental alignment, and clinical outcomes. Summary of Background Data: Biomechanical studies suggest cross-links enhance rotational stability in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion, but clinical evidence for their benefit in degenerative lumbar spine diseases remains limited. No previous clinical study has investigated how cross-link addition affects LIF outcomes. Methods: One hundred thirty-one patients underwent single-level LIF for degenerative lumbar spine diseases (2012–2022) and were categorized into cross-link (CL, n=64) and non-cross-link (NCL, n=67) groups. Researchers assessed CT-based fusion parameters (interbody and facet fusion rates), segmental alignment measurements (segmental lordosis, disk height, and coronal tilt), and clinical outcomes (JOA and VAS scores) over a minimum 1-year follow-up. Propensity score matching minimized selection bias. Results: One-year interbody fusion rates were comparable between groups (CL: 72.1% vs. NCL: 69.1%, P =0.839). No significant differences were found in facet fusion rates (CL: 37.7% vs. NCL: 30.9%, P =0.558), pedicle screw loosening (CL: 8.2% vs. NCL: 16.4%, P =0.254), or cage subsidence (CL: 9.8% vs. NCL: 9.1%, P =1.000). Clinical outcomes improved similarly in both groups based on final JOA scores (CL: 26.0±6.8 vs. NCL: 25.3±4.3, P =0.47) and VAS back pain scores (CL: 21.8±20.8 vs. NCL: 22.9±22.7, P =0.79). Propensity score-matched analysis of 32 patients per group confirmed these findings. Conclusions: Routine use of cross-link in single-level LIF does not improve radiographic or clinical outcomes after 1 year. A selective approach could reduce costs while maintaining excellent patient outcomes.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Koichiro Shima, Bungo Otsuki, Koichi Murata, Takayoshi Shimizu, Takashi Sono, Shintaro Honda, Masaki Sakamoto, Takaki Yoshiyama, Ryohei Saito, Shuichi Matsuda
Quelle
Clinical Spine Surgery
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2380-0186, 2380-0194
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Koichiro Shima, Bungo Otsuki, Koichi Murata, Takayoshi Shimizu, Takashi Sono, Shintaro Honda, Masaki Sakamoto, Takaki Yoshiyama, Ryohei Saito, Shuichi Matsuda (2026). Effects of Adding a Cross-Link During Single-Level Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases: A Computed Tomography-Based Analysis. Clinical Spine Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000002157
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON