EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr 10/10Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Efficacy and Safety of Pritelivir Versus Foscarnet for the Treatment of Acyclovir-Refractory Herpes Simplex Virus Infection in Immunocompromised Adults: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase 2 Trial

Camille N Kotton, Kimberly A Workowski, Princy N Kumar, Robin K Avery, Roy F Chemaly, Nicolas C Issa, Moti Ramgopal, Joshua T Schiffer, Joerg Albrecht, Hollis R O’Neal Jr, Pranatharthi Chandrasekar, Tanya S Schreibman, Mayur Ramesh, Michael G Ison, Melanie E Sumner, Aaron Dane, Bernadette Surujbally, Burkhard Timmler, Manickam Rangaraju, Genofeva A Papanicolaou, Alexander Birkmann, Anna Wald

Open Forum Infectious Diseases · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Abstract Background Immunocompromised patients are at risk for severe, prolonged herpes simplex virus (HSV) recurrences. Refractory disease and intolerance to standard therapy drive an unmet medical need. Pritelivir, a novel HSV helicase-primase inhibitor, has shown favorable tolerability and efficacy in immunocompetent adults. Methods PRIOH-1, a multicenter, randomized, open-label Phase 2 trial compared oral pritelivir (400 mg loading dose followed by 100 mg daily) versus intravenous foscarnet (40 mg/kg q8h or 60 mg/kg q12h) for up to 28 days in immunocompromised adults with acyclovir-refractory HSV (Part A). Participants with refractoriness/intolerance to foscarnet received pritelivir (Part B). The primary endpoint was time to lesion healing; secondary endpoints included healing rate, HSV DNA detection, and resistance. Results Twenty-two participants enrolled in Part A, eight in Part B. In Part A, median time to healing was 26.0 days (95% CI 13.0–31.0) with pritelivir, versus not estimable (95% CI 20.0–NE) with foscarnet (HR 2.7, 95% CI 0.33–21.8; p=0.34). Investigator-assessed healing rates were 93% with pritelivir, 57% with foscarnet; a 36.2% difference (95% CI -10.1–74.1; p=0.077). Post-baseline HSV DNA detection rates were 34.8% and 50.0%, respectively (p=0.42). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 60% of pritelivir- and 100% of foscarnet-treated participants; serious treatment-emergent adverse events were less frequent with pritelivir. In Part B, median time to healing was 19.0 days with a 63% healing rate. Conclusions Pritelivir demonstrated encouraging efficacy and favorable safety in immunocompromised adults with limited treatment options, supporting Phase 3 evaluation for the treatment of refractory HSV infection in this population.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Camille N Kotton, Kimberly A Workowski, Princy N Kumar, Robin K Avery, Roy F Chemaly, Nicolas C Issa, Moti Ramgopal, Joshua T Schiffer, Joerg Albrecht, Hollis R O’Neal Jr, Pranatharthi Chandrasekar, Tanya S Schreibman, Mayur Ramesh, Michael G Ison, Melanie E Sumner, Aaron Dane, Bernadette Surujbally, Burkhard Timmler, Manickam Rangaraju, Genofeva A Papanicolaou, Alexander Birkmann, Anna Wald
Quelle
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2328-8957
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Camille N Kotton, Kimberly A Workowski, Princy N Kumar, Robin K Avery, Roy F Chemaly, Nicolas C Issa, Moti Ramgopal, Joshua T Schiffer, Joerg Albrecht, Hollis R O’Neal Jr, Pranatharthi Chandrasekar, Tanya S Schreibman, Mayur Ramesh, Michael G Ison, Melanie E Sumner, Aaron Dane, Bernadette Surujbally, Burkhard Timmler, Manickam Rangaraju, Genofeva A Papanicolaou, Alexander Birkmann, Anna Wald (2026). Efficacy and Safety of Pritelivir Versus Foscarnet for the Treatment of Acyclovir-Refractory Herpes Simplex Virus Infection in Immunocompromised Adults: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase 2 Trial. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofag539
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1