EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Robust replication of associations across patient-mediated and provider-sourced EHR data in the All of Us research program

Chenjie Zeng, Bennett J. Waxse, Joshua C. Denny

npj Digital Public Health · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Abstract The All of Us Research Program is assembling a nationwide cohort with electronic health record (EHR) resources through two complementary pathways: healthcare provider organization (HPO)-sourced EHRs and patient-mediated EHR (PME) contributed through patient portal linkages. The comparative research utility of these two data sources has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we compared PME and HPO EHRs with respect to disease prevalence, phenotype–phenotype associations, and replication of established genotype-phenotype associations using data from 19,703 PME and 373,887 HPO participants. We benchmarked disease prevalence against national estimates, conducted phenome-wide association studies for 10 commonly studied diseases, and tested replication of more than 5000 established genotype-phenotype associations across multiple ancestral groups. Disease prevalence was consistently lower in PME than in HPO, although prevalence of most diseases in both cohorts exceeded national estimates. Both data sources reproduced known phenotype–phenotype associations and showed moderate-to-strong concordance in effect sizes across the phenome. The overall genotype-phenotype replication rate was 49.1% (5399/10,999) in HPO and 5.9% (381/6482) in PME across ancestral groups, with effect sizes strongly correlated among well-powered associations ( R = 0.84, P < 0.001). To disentangle the impact of sample size from data quality, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching. After matching, the replication gap in genotype-phenotype associations narrowed from 8.3-fold to 1.3-fold, with equivalent replication rates among adequately powered associations and strongly concordant effect sizes; comorbidity patterns were also consistent across all 10 diseases tested. These findings demonstrate that both data sources are valuable for clinical and genomic research and can inform other cohorts integrating provider-derived and patient-mediated EHRs.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Chenjie Zeng, Bennett J. Waxse, Joshua C. Denny
Quelle
npj Digital Public Health
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
3091-2784
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Chenjie Zeng, Bennett J. Waxse, Joshua C. Denny (2026). Robust replication of associations across patient-mediated and provider-sourced EHR data in the All of Us research program. npj Digital Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44482-026-00032-8
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1