EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr 10/10Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Nutraceuticals and phytoceuticals for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Michele Fornaro, Chiara Di Lorenzo, Nicolas Nunez, Alessandro Miola, Raffaella Calati, André Ferrer Carvalho, Luca Steardo, Brendon Stubbs, David Mischoulon, Christoph U. Correll, Marco Solmi

Molecular Psychiatry · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Abstract Background “Nutraceuticals” and “phytoceuticals” may have antidepressant activity, prompting an in-depth network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Methods Systematic review and network meta-analysis (PubMed/MEDLINE/EMBASE/Scopus/PsycINFO/CENTRAL/ClinicalTrials.gov (until 01/07/2025) of RCTs vs. placebo or treatment as usual (TAU = antidepressants) testing nutraceuticals/phytoceuticals in major depressive disorder (MDD). Change in depressive symptomatology (standardized-mean-difference = SMD), treatment response, and all-cause discontinuation (acceptability) (risk ratio = RR) were co-primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were anxiety symptom changes, adverse event-related discontinuation (“tolerability”), and symptom remission. We conducted subgroup, transitivity, and sensitivity analyses to explore/reduce heterogeneity, and assessed global/local inconsistency, publication bias, risk of bias (RoB), and confidence in the evidence (CINeMA/AMSTAR-Plus). Results Across 163 studies (n = 15,757, distinct compounds’ combinations n = 137), several molecules/classes outperformed placebo with very large effect sizes. Restricting analyses to compounds with ≥2RCTs/non-TAU antidepressants/low RoB/non-sponsored trials/non-outliers, higher-than-expected/unrealistic effect sizes emerged vs. placebo for eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) (k = 20, n = 8483; SMD = −1.67;95%C.I. = −2.38;−0.97), vitamin D3 (k = 3, n = 344; SMD = −1.59;95%C.I. = −2.71;−0.46), and St. John’s-wort-extract-ZE117 (k = 3,n = 207;SMD = −1.02;95%C.I = −1.90;−0.15) regarding depressive symptomatology. Substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 85.3%;95%C.I. = 81.9%;88.0%) and global inconsistency (Q-between-designs = 186.91, p < 0.0001) emerged, explained by subgroup and sensitivity analyses, without publication bias. Additionally, a medium effect size emerged vs. placebo for curcumin (k = 2,n = 89;SMD = −0.58;95%C.I. = −0.99;−0.18) regarding anxiety reduction in low RoB analyses. Shugan granules, EPA, EPA+Docosahexaenoic Acid, ZE117, and fluoxetine+EPA response and St. John’s wort extract WS5570/ZE117 remission significantly outperformed placebo. Citicoline was associated with significantly more dropouts than placebo. A meta-regression of efficacy effect sizes against adapted AMSTAR-Plus scores showed that larger SMDs were associated with lower AMSTAR scores, indicating lower study quality. Confidence in the evidence was low to very low. Conclusions Upon filtering low-quality evidence, only a few nutraceutical/phytoceuticals showed potential for depressive symptoms, warranting more rigorous trials.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Michele Fornaro, Chiara Di Lorenzo, Nicolas Nunez, Alessandro Miola, Raffaella Calati, André Ferrer Carvalho, Luca Steardo, Brendon Stubbs, David Mischoulon, Christoph U. Correll, Marco Solmi
Quelle
Molecular Psychiatry
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
1359-4184, 1476-5578
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Michele Fornaro, Chiara Di Lorenzo, Nicolas Nunez, Alessandro Miola, Raffaella Calati, André Ferrer Carvalho, Luca Steardo, Brendon Stubbs, David Mischoulon, Christoph U. Correll, Marco Solmi (2026). Nutraceuticals and phytoceuticals for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Molecular Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-026-03759-1
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1