EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Video‐Assisted Versus Conventional Surgical Informed Consent in Visceral Surgery—A Cluster Quasi‐Randomized Clinical Trial

Svenja G. P. D. Leicht, Leon Schuetze, Johan F. Lock, Christoph‐Thomas Germer, Johanna C. Wagner

World Journal of Surgery · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

ABSTRACT Background Comprehensive informed consent is a core surgical responsibility but is increasingly challenged by rising patient volumes and limited personnel resources. Digital solutions in healthcare offer opportunities to optimize patient education. Video‐assisted informed consent may reduce time expenditure without compromising informational quality. The objective was to compare video‐assisted with conventional informed consent regarding duration, patient understanding, patient, and physician satisfaction. Methods In this prospective, cluster quasi‐randomized clinical trial at the University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany (September 2023−March 2025), 153 of 330 screened patients scheduled for elective cholecystectomy or colon resection were enrolled. The intervention group received a video developed by medudoc education GmbH , while the control group received physician‐led informed consent according to the hospital's standard. Consultation duration was recorded using a stopwatch. Patients completed questionnaires on satisfaction and understanding immediately after consent and postoperatively, physicians rated satisfaction at study completion. The primary outcome was time reduction for the physician consultation time. Secondary outcomes included patient understanding, patient satisfaction, physician satisfaction, and postoperative pain. Results Of 153 participants, 84 (55%) received video‐assisted and 69 (45%) conventional consent. Median physician consultation time was significantly reduced with video assistance for cholecystectomy (1.5 vs. 8.1 min) and colon resection (3.3 vs. 11.9 min). Patient understanding, satisfaction, and postoperative pain outcomes were high in both groups. Physician satisfaction with the video‐assisted process was consistently high. Conclusions Video‐assisted surgical informed consent serves as a valuable adjunct in preoperative patient education and represents a promising approach to digital innovation in clinical practice. Trial Registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN26680260 ( https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=ISRCTN26680260 )

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Svenja G. P. D. Leicht, Leon Schuetze, Johan F. Lock, Christoph‐Thomas Germer, Johanna C. Wagner
Quelle
World Journal of Surgery
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0364-2313, 1432-2323
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Svenja G. P. D. Leicht, Leon Schuetze, Johan F. Lock, Christoph‐Thomas Germer, Johanna C. Wagner (2026). Video‐Assisted Versus Conventional Surgical Informed Consent in Visceral Surgery—A Cluster Quasi‐Randomized Clinical Trial. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70561
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1 · Lizenz 2