EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Measuring Nursing Productivity Based on a Review of the Literature: A Pilot Study

Elahe Farzan, Zhila Najafpour, Efat Jahanbani, Mohamad Arezomand

Health Science Reports · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

ABSTRACT Background and Aims One of the performance indicators of nurses is measuring their productivity. This is despite the fact that there is a serious weakness regarding the criteria to measure nursing productivity. Therefore, this study aimed to define the productivity indicators and to conduct a pilot test using the productivity measures in a hospital. Methods This multi‐phase study is conducted in three parts. In the first phase, a review is conducted to extract nurses' productivity measures. In the second phase, the measures are prioritized and evaluated using experts' opinions. Finally, a pilot study based on the list of productivity measures is implemented. For this reason, we conducted a time‐motion study to analyze work efficiency in a pilot hospital. Results In the systematic review phase, 11 articles were included in the study. They reported several measures like actual working hours, expected working hours, nurses' salaries and benefits, the number of patients under care, and relative value units (RVU) as indicators to measure nurses' productivity. Experts rated output/input, standard hours/actual hours, productive hours in patient day, and actual hours as more feasible, valid, and important indicators to measure productivity for nurses. Finally, in the third phase of this study, in order to measure actual working hours, nursing activities were extracted. Thirty‐six nurses were observed and evaluated in three internal, surgical, and special care units. The mean monthly clinical time was highest in the Internal Medicine unit (116.17 h), followed by the Surgical unit (109.93 h), and the Intensive Care unit (106.83 h). The ICU had the highest standard, recorded (Timex‐based), and paid hours. Finally, productivity was calculated by dividing clinical work hours by attendance hours in units. Performance ratio (productivity) was about 77%, 75%, and 68% in the internal medicine, surgical, and intensive care units, respectively. Conclusions The productivity status of nurses was at a desirable level. The average productivity of nurses in the internal unit was higher than others. The productivity index can be the criterion of action in the field of performance‐based payment.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Elahe Farzan, Zhila Najafpour, Efat Jahanbani, Mohamad Arezomand
Quelle
Health Science Reports
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2398-8835, 2398-8835
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Elahe Farzan, Zhila Najafpour, Efat Jahanbani, Mohamad Arezomand (2026). Measuring Nursing Productivity Based on a Review of the Literature: A Pilot Study. Health Science Reports. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.73218
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1 · Lizenz 2