EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.3390/polym8030084

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2000

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

<b>Background</b>: Falls are the most common hospital-acquired adverse event, leading to extended hospitalization, loss of independence, disability, and premature death. Routine fall risk assessments are time-consuming, even with limited factors. An AI-derived fall prediction model can provide more comprehensive and comparably accurate risk predictions quickly and as often as needed. <b>Objective</b>: To develop and validate a fall prediction model for fall risk in adult inpatients. <b>Methods</b>: Patient records from 2016 were extracted from the adult inpatient database, including information from the Electronic Inpatient Medication Records, SAP, and Hospital Incident Reporting System. The sample consisted of 1506 cases (1:5 faller to non-faller). The fall prediction model was trained using the following four variables: demographics, diagnosis, medications, and surgery. Data sources included the hospital's data repository, integrating admission/discharge, pharmacy, laboratory, and incident reports. <b>Results</b>: The support vector machine model performed best among all tested models, achieving an AUC of 0.803, recall of 0.816, and precision of 0.440. In the validation cohort (978 patients: 163 fallers and 815 non-fallers), the fall prediction model demonstrated moderate-to-good discrimination (AUC 0.79), with accuracy of 0.67, sensitivity of 0.46, and specificity of 0.86. Compared with the nursing four-item fall risk assessment, which showed lower discrimination (AUC 0.65, accuracy 0.65, sensitivity 0.58, specificity 0.72), the fall prediction model had better specificity and overall discrimination, though the nursing tool was more sensitive in identifying fallers. <b>Conclusions</b>: The fall prediction model using demographics, diagnoses, medication, and surgery data predicts falls risk effectively. It enables timely, accurate risk assessments and supports preventive interventions, saving nurses' time for direct patient care.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2000-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2000). 10.3390/polym8030084. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16080283
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON