EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Content validity of digital health competence measures for nursing in South Africa

Amanda Cromhout, Felicity Daniels, Jennifer Chipps

Frontiers in Public Health · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Introduction The increasing use of digital technology to improve healthcare outcomes for patients and institutions requires that nurses have adequate levels of digital competence, measured by psychometrically sound measures. However, most measures are developed in high-income countries and have not been adapted to other settings. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the content validity of two measures, developed in Finland, that measure digital competence ( DigiHealthCom ) and influences on digital competence ( DigiComInf ), for their application in South Africa. Methods Participants were predominantly nurses from private and public facilities in South Africa who completed an online content validity rating scale ( n = 12) South Africa by rating the relevance and clarity of each item and subscale of competence ( DigiHealthCom ) and influence ( DigiComInf ). Of these, ten participated in an online focus group discussion. Ratings were analysed by calculating individual item content validity indices (I-CVI) and scale and subscale average content validity indices (S-CVI/Ave). Results I-CVI values for relevance and clarity were mostly >.78, except for some items in the “human-centred remote counselling competence” subscale ( DigiHealthCom ) and one item in DigiComInf . S-CVIs were sufficient for DigiHealthCom (S-CVI relevance /Ave = 0.86, S-CVI clarity /Ave = 0.87) and DigiComInf (S-CVI relevance /Ave = 0.95, S-CVI clarity /Ave = 0.89). The focus group discussion highlighted several concerns, such as the absence of discerning, contextually relevant definitions for the constructs measured, lack of clarity about the target population, and applicability of certain items to different healthcare contexts. Discussion Adaptations included adding relevant definitions, clarifying the target population or management level, adding a “not applicable” option to the rating scale and clarifying the meaning or context using appropriate alternative words. The final measure was approved by the participants and the original authors of the measures.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Amanda Cromhout, Felicity Daniels, Jennifer Chipps
Quelle
Frontiers in Public Health
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2296-2565
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Amanda Cromhout, Felicity Daniels, Jennifer Chipps (2026). Content validity of digital health competence measures for nursing in South Africa. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1874126
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1