EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr 7/7Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Predicting clinically significant medication errors: Development and validation of a risk stratification model using incident reporting data

Saad M. Wali, Nawaf S. Alqurashi, Malaz J. Gazzaz, Sharaf E. Sharaf, Maan H. Harbi, Fahad J. Alqahtani, Ohood K. Almuzaini, Eman O. Alsheikh, Saleh A. Almarshad, Sahar A. Abduljawad, Mohammed M. Aldurdunji

Frontiers in Medicine · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Background Medication error reporting systems capture large volumes of incidents, yet only a small proportion lead to clinically significant patient outcomes. Distinguishing these high-risk errors from the majority of low-impact events remains a major challenge for healthcare systems. This study aimed to develop a predictive model to identify medication errors at elevated risk of clinical significance in a tertiary care setting. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Al-Noor Specialist Hospital in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, analyzing medication error reports from January 2023 to August 2025. Clinically significant errors were defined as those reaching the patient with or without harm (NCC MERP Categories C–G). Univariate analyses identified candidate predictors, followed by multivariable logistic regression with category collapsing for model efficiency. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Brier score. Risk stratification divided predicted probabilities into low, moderate, and high-risk groups. Results Among 6,397 medication errors, 227 (3.5%) were clinically significant. The final model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.825) and calibration (Brier score = 0.029). Independent predictors of clinically significant errors were high-risk error stages including administration, dispensing, and monitoring (OR = 19.1, 95% CI: 14.1–26.1), high-risk medication classes such as antibiotics and oncology agents (OR = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.62–4.78), intermediate or other medication classes (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.39–4.18), selection or information errors (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.40–3.46), and lack of staff experience (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.33–2.49). Variables describing who detected or who committed the error were deliberately excluded from the model because they are not available at the moment an error occurs. Risk stratification classified 10.1% of errors as high-risk, capturing 62.6% of all clinically significant events. Conclusion A parsimonious predictive model using readily available incident report data can effectively identify medication errors at elevated risk of clinical significance. The risk-stratification framework enables prioritization of safety resources toward high-risk incidents requiring immediate intervention.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Saad M. Wali, Nawaf S. Alqurashi, Malaz J. Gazzaz, Sharaf E. Sharaf, Maan H. Harbi, Fahad J. Alqahtani, Ohood K. Almuzaini, Eman O. Alsheikh, Saleh A. Almarshad, Sahar A. Abduljawad, Mohammed M. Aldurdunji
Quelle
Frontiers in Medicine
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
2296-858X
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Saad M. Wali, Nawaf S. Alqurashi, Malaz J. Gazzaz, Sharaf E. Sharaf, Maan H. Harbi, Fahad J. Alqahtani, Ohood K. Almuzaini, Eman O. Alsheikh, Saleh A. Almarshad, Sahar A. Abduljawad, Mohammed M. Aldurdunji (2026). Predicting clinically significant medication errors: Development and validation of a risk stratification model using incident reporting data. Frontiers in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1887290
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1