EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.1016/0967-0653(93)93899-3

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2000

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

<h4>Background</h4>Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are a common assessment tool used to evaluate the application of clinical knowledge, clinical reasoning, competency-based performance, and professional behavior in health care education. Their development and facilitation are often included under the broader umbrella of simulation pedagogies. Despite their widespread adoption and the availability of guidelines, variability exists in approaches specific to OSCE development, implementation, and evaluation.<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this scoping review is to explore and describe the variability and similarities in OSCE development, implementation, and evaluation in nursing, midwifery, and medical education in the context of existing guidelines to inform future directive work in this area.<h4>Methods</h4>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews, with searches conducted by a librarian familiar with the scoping review process. Records retrieved will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). Two reviewers will independently assess the records for inclusion against the defined criteria and extract data using an adapted JBI extraction form. The data will be charted using narrative summary text, tables, and figures.<h4>Results</h4>As of July 2026, a search for existing reviews in the PubMed, PROSPERO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and JBI Evidence Synthesis databases has been conducted, yielding no current or in-progress reviews on our specific topic. An initial search feasibility assessment has been conducted to ensure sufficient articles for a robust review. Data collection, extraction, and analysis will be conducted over the 12 months following the literature search. The completed scoping review is anticipated to be submitted for publication in summer 2027.<h4>Conclusions</h4>This review will provide a comprehensive overview of how OSCEs are operationalized across nursing, midwifery, and medical programs. It will highlight emerging themes, key differences between guidelines and practice, and underresearched areas, informing future research and educational practice.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2000-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2000). 10.1016/0967-0653(93)93899-3. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.2196/93899
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1 · Lizenz 2