EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.1016/0967-0653(94)92533-x

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2000

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

BACKGROUND: Enhancing nursing students' awareness, attitudes, beliefs, and preparedness toward AI may help improve their health care knowledge and practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess nursing students' attitudes, perceptions, self-efficacy, barriers, and anxiety, which influence their readiness to adopt AI in nursing practice. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional, correlational design. Data were collected from 307 nursing internship students using an 8-part, self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Increased self-efficacy with computers was correlated with decreased barriers to accessing AI technology, lower computer anxiety scale scores (r=-0.27, P<.001 and r=-0.57, P<.001, respectively), and higher perceptions of using AI (r=0.27, P<.001). Meanwhile, nursing students' readiness to adopt AI in nursing practice was negatively associated with barriers to accessing AI technology (r=-0.20, P<.001) and positively associated with attitudes toward and perceptions of using AI (r=0.32, P<.001 and r=0.14, P=.01, respectively). Increased barriers to accessing AI technology were associated with negative attitudes toward AI and nursing students' perceptions of using AI (r=-0.34, P<.001 and r=-0.39, P<.001, respectively). A multilayer neural network model identified barriers (relative importance=0.27), attitudes (relative importance=0.16), and perceptions (relative importance=0.15) as the most significant predictors, while self-efficacy (relative importance=0.11) and anxiety (relative importance=0.07) showed smaller contributions, despite nonsignificant bivariate associations with nursing students' AI readiness. The model demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving a low relative error of 0.62 in the training set. The stability and generalization ability of the model were supported by the training and testing set results, which yielded a training sum of squares error of 65.93 and a testing sum of squares error of 35.49, showing no signs of overfitting. CONCLUSIONS: Several contributing factors influenced nursing students' readiness to embrace AI, with barriers, attitudes, and perceptions emerging as the most consistent, whereas self-efficacy and anxiety may play indirect roles. To improve the adoption of AI among nursing students, such factors should be dealt with in such educational programs; an interrelated adoption of AI in nursing practice is expounded as a more favorable environment.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2000-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2000). 10.1016/0967-0653(94)92533-x. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.2196/92533
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1 · Lizenz 2