EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.1177/1056789514562152

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2015

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Contemporary nursing practice increasingly takes place within culturally, religiously, and ethically plural healthcare environments. Although professional standards provide a shared ethical foundation, limited conceptual attention has been given to how nurses' religious moral identities influence ethical reasoning during cross-gender care. Existing discussions of professionalism remain largely grounded in secular ethical perspectives, leaving insufficient exploration of how faith-based moral traditions may contribute to professional identity and moral agency. This paper examines gender interaction in nursing through Islamic ethical perspectives and proposes a conceptual framework of faith-informed professionalism to contribute to broader discussions of ethical pluralism in nursing ethics. A conceptual normative analysis was undertaken through critical engagement with literature on nursing professionalism, moral agency, ethical pluralism, and Islamic ethics. Relevant concepts were identified, interpreted, and synthesised to develop a conceptual framework integrating professional standards with Islamic ethical principles relevant to gender interaction in nursing practice. The analysis argues that gender interaction should be understood not only as a matter of professional conduct but also as an ethically significant encounter in which Muslim nurses negotiate professional responsibilities alongside religiously informed moral commitments. Drawing on the concepts of haya', adab, niyyah, ikhtilat, darurah, and maqasid al-shariah, the paper develops faith-informed professionalism as a conceptual framework that explains how faith-based moral commitments may coexist with professional standards while maintaining patient welfare, professional accountability, and equitable care as overriding priorities. A clinical illustration demonstrates the framework's application as a guide for ethical reflection rather than a prescriptive model for practice. Faith-informed professionalism extends contemporary discussions of moral agency, professional identity, and ethical pluralism by recognising that religious moral traditions may complement, rather than compete with, established professional standards. The proposed framework offers a theoretical contribution to nursing ethics and provides a foundation for future empirical research and educational development within multicultural healthcare environments.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2015-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2015). 10.1177/1056789514562152. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330261476264
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON