EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

10.1177/1056789514562152

CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 2015

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

BackgroundIn healthcare, patients are inherently required to undress, expose their bodies, and entrust themselves to others at their most vulnerable states. However, the potential sexual dignity discomfort (SDD) during these moments remains an underexplored dimension of patient dignity in healthcare settings. Unaddressed SDD can erode patients' trust in providers, prompt avoidance of necessary care, and ultimately compromise health outcomes.Research aimThis study aimed to develop and validate a culturally grounded clinical protocol to prevent patients' SDD in South Korean healthcare settings.Research designA multistep protocol-development design was employed, comprising protocol development, Delphi validation, and interview-informed refinement.Participants and research contextA total of 26 healthcare professionals from diverse clinical settings in South Korea participated in the Delphi surveys, and nine experts participated in in-depth interviews.Ethical considerationsThis study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chung-Ang University, and all participants provided informed consent.FindingsThe initial Delphi survey demonstrated high perceived necessity and importance of the protocol items but relatively lower feasibility and practice, revealing a gap between ethical awareness and practical implementation. Qualitative interviews identified several barriers to implementation, including sociocultural norms, defensive clinical attitudes, structural constraints, and hierarchical power dynamics. Based on these findings, the protocol was refined and finalized with 7 domains and 24 items.ConclusionsThe protocol developed in this study offers an evidence-based and culturally feasible framework not only as a practical guide for healthcare providers but also as an affirmation that every patient who exposes their body in clinical care deserves to have their dignity recognized, respected, and actively protected.

Abstract: PubMed · Datensatz

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Nicht angegeben
Quelle
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs
Publikation
2015-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0849-6757
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

(2015). 10.1177/1056789514562152. CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330261476263
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON