Patient acceptability and preferences for communication of coronary artery calcification findings in the NHS targeted lung health checks: a qualitative study

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Objectives To explore how participants in the UK’s Targeted Lung Health Check (TLHC) programme understand and respond to incidental findings of coronary artery calcification (CAC) and to identify patient preferences for communication that might enhance engagement with cardiovascular prevention such as lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Design Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. Setting One general practice participating in the National Health Service TLHC programme in North-East England, an area of high social deprivation. Participants Ten adults aged 59–71 years with CAC detected on TLHC CT scans and a calculated QRISK >10%. Primary outcome To explore patient understanding of incidental CAC findings and how this influences engagement with cardiovascular prevention. Secondary outcomes To identify patient preferences for receiving and discussing CAC results, including preferred communication methods, terminology and the role of the clinician in shaping preventive treatment decisions. Results Patients initially reported understanding their findings but deeper exploration revealed misconceptions about personal cardiovascular disease risk. A lack of trust in doctors and reliance on non-clinical information sources (social media, family and friends) were barriers to LLT uptake. Trust in the medical professional giving the advice also shaped acceptance of LLT. Conclusion Enhancing patient education on CAC findings, fostering doctor-patient trust and tailoring communication strategies may improve LLT uptake. Personalised follow-up and clearer risk explanations could reduce hesitancy and improve engagement with preventive care.