EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr Sources10/10 Journal Tree
Easy Demo

European Health Evidence

The European alternative to PubMed

EUVIMED is the European alternative to PubMed: a central, multilingual research platform for medicine, nursing, life sciences and healthcare. It brings together international and European literature sources, study registries, open-access full texts, citations and retraction notices in one search. Unlike pure bibliographic databases, EUVIMED supports the entire research process – from discovery and appraisal with LIVIA and CLARA to traceable evidence synthesis. European in focus, transparent, interoperable and designed for science and healthcare.

EuropeanMultilingualInteroperableTraceable

EUVIMED BETA

EUVIMED is currently in beta

EUVIMED is under continuous development. Features, data coverage and presentation may change or be temporarily incomplete.

Results are beta

Search results, classifications, summaries and AI-assisted assessments may be incomplete, delayed or incorrect.

Check original sources

Do not use EUVIMED results without verification for diagnosis, treatment or other clinical decisions. Always consult the original source and applicable guidelines.

Errors and feedback help us improve EUVIMED: info@euvimed.com

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Feasibility and Operator-Reported Utility of Transesophageal Lung Ultrasound As an Adjunct to Resuscitative Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Shock: A Multicenter Observational Study

Vladyslav Dieiev, Pedro D. Salinas, Felipe Teran, Clark G. Owyang, Dylan Rupska, Aniruddh Kapoor, Zubair Siddiqui, Daniel Strama, Cindy Ndiaye, Nathaniel A. Sands, Aarthi Kaviyarasu, Katharine M. Burns

Critical Care Medicine · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Objectives: To describe the utilization, feasibility, and operator-reported diagnostic and management impact of transesophageal lung ultrasound (TELUS) integrated into resuscitative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the assessment of mechanically ventilated adults with shock. Design: Multicenter observational cohort study using prospectively collected data. Setting: Twenty-three hospitals from the Resuscitative Transesophageal Echocardiography Collaborative Registry (rTEECoRe) network. Patients: From 1213 registry TEE examinations, 379 met the inclusion criteria for shock evaluation or hemodynamic monitoring in mechanically ventilated adults; 96 (25.3%) of these included TELUS. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: TELUS integration was associated with significantly higher operator-reported identification of shock etiology compared with resuscitative TEE alone (86.5% vs. 75.3%; odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.02–3.72; p = 0.04). Although overall clinical management changes were more frequently reported in the TELUS group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (78.1% vs. 71.7%; OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.82–2.41; p = 0.22). TELUS examinations were associated with longer procedure duration (median 21.5 vs.19.0 min; p = 0.01) and were predominantly performed by intensivists. Pulmonary findings, including B-lines, pleural effusions, consolidations, and A-line patterns, varied in frequency and were occasionally associated with specific respiratory or antimicrobial interventions. Procedure-related complications were rare and similar between groups. Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort of mechanically ventilated adults with shock, adding TELUS to resuscitative TEE was associated with a higher rate of operator-reported identification of shock etiology and was feasible with minimal additional procedure time. Prospective studies with standardized TELUS acquisition and interpretation, independent adjudication, and evaluation of patient-centered outcomes are needed to define clinical scenarios of incremental value.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Vladyslav Dieiev, Pedro D. Salinas, Felipe Teran, Clark G. Owyang, Dylan Rupska, Aniruddh Kapoor, Zubair Siddiqui, Daniel Strama, Cindy Ndiaye, Nathaniel A. Sands, Aarthi Kaviyarasu, Katharine M. Burns
Quelle
Critical Care Medicine
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
0090-3493, 1530-0293
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Vladyslav Dieiev, Pedro D. Salinas, Felipe Teran, Clark G. Owyang, Dylan Rupska, Aniruddh Kapoor, Zubair Siddiqui, Daniel Strama, Cindy Ndiaye, Nathaniel A. Sands, Aarthi Kaviyarasu, Katharine M. Burns (2026). Feasibility and Operator-Reported Utility of Transesophageal Lung Ultrasound As an Adjunct to Resuscitative Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Shock: A Multicenter Observational Study. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007337
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1