EUVIMEDEuropean Health Evidence
Uhr 7/7Sources Journal Tree
Easy Demo

Lokaler Crossref-Datenbestand · journal-article

Subcutaneous ureteral bypass explantation in 21 cats (2015-2023): outcomes and owner perceptions

Sophie E Broughton, Anna Frykfors von Hekkel, Matteo Rossanese, Lynda Rutherford, Rebecca F Geddes, Jack S Lawson

Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine · 2026

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Abstract Background Subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) can be an effective treatment for ureteral obstruction in cats, but SUB explantation is little documented. Hypothesis/Objectives Describe reasons for SUB explantation, outcomes, and owner experiences. We hypothesized that explantation would be effective in managing common SUB-related complications. Animals Twenty-one cats (31 SUBs) that underwent 29 explantations. Methods Retrospective case-series of cats undergoing explantation between 2015 and 2023 with medical record review and 20 owners emailed for follow-up. Results are median (range). Results Explantation was performed 1.8 years (0.2-4.1 years) after placement because of positive urine culture (PUC; 15/21), SUB obstruction (8/21), sterile cystitis (4/21), and suspected SUB failure (2/21). Twenty-six out of 31 ureters had documented patency. Seventeen cats had all implants removed (9 unilateral, 8 bilateral). Two underwent unilateral explantation and ipsilateral ureteronephrectomy. Two with bilateral SUBs underwent unilateral explantation. Follow-up after explantation was 596 days (3-2310 days). Four cats had ureteral re-obstruction (1 after partial obstruction at explantation), 10 did not re-obstruct and the remainder were undetermined. Seven cats died at 614 days (405-2200 days), 11 were lost to follow-up at 135 days (19-1774 days) after explantation, and 3 remained alive. Four deaths were renal related (2/4 re-obstructions). Nine of 15 cats explanted due to PUC had a negative postoperative urine culture. Three of 15 cats had clinical signs related to PUC postoperatively. Questionnaire response was 9 of 20, and 8 of 9 owners would consider explantation if in the same situation again. Conclusions and clinical importance For SUB cats with complications, explantation is a viable option. A small proportion of cats had clinical signs of PUC, or ureteral re-obstruction postoperatively.

Bibliografischer Nachweis

Publikationsdaten

Autor:innen
Sophie E Broughton, Anna Frykfors von Hekkel, Matteo Rossanese, Lynda Rutherford, Rebecca F Geddes, Jack S Lawson
Quelle
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Publikation
2026-01-01
Band / Ausgabe
Nicht angegeben
Seiten
Nicht angegeben
ISSN / ISBN
1939-1676
Zitationen
0 laut Crossref
Referenzen
0 hinterlegt

Zitieren

Zitierfähiger Nachweis

Sophie E Broughton, Anna Frykfors von Hekkel, Matteo Rossanese, Lynda Rutherford, Rebecca F Geddes, Jack S Lawson (2026). Subcutaneous ureteral bypass explantation in 21 cats (2015-2023): outcomes and owner perceptions. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/jvimsj/aalag197
RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON

Kontext

Themen, Förderung und Nutzung

Lizenzhinweise: Lizenz 1