Evaluating retrieval-augmented generation versus long-context input for clinical reasoning over electronic health records

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Abstract Objective To evaluate whether retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can serve as an efficient alternative to long-context prompting for clinical reasoning over electronic health records (EHRs). Materials and Methods We defined 3 EHR-based tasks that are replicable across health systems and vary in reasoning complexity: (1) extracting imaging procedures (modality, date, and anatomic site), (2) generating timelines of therapeutic antibiotic use, and (3) identifying the key diagnoses for a hospitalization. Using real inpatient clinical notes from a US academic health system, we evaluated 3 large language models (GPT-5.4-mini, Mistral Medium 3, DeepSeek V3.1) with varying amounts of provided context, comparing targeted retrieval to using the most recent clinical notes. Results For Imaging Procedures, RAG strongly outperformed recent-note inputs and exceeded long-context performance (by 0.17-9.83 F1 across all models) using fewer than 8K tokens. Similar benefits were observed for Antibiotic Timelines, where