Objective Quantification of Soft-Tissue Balance in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Expanded Validation of the Pendulum Knee Drop Test Across Multiple Surgeons

Vollständiger Abstract

Worum geht es in dieser Arbeit?

Abstract Despite increasing evidence showing major diversity in subjective balancing approaches, soft-tissue balance during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains primarily based upon empirical surgeon assessment. A quantitative technique for describing knee stiffness and laxity after TKA was previously introduced: the modified pendulum knee drop (PKD) test. This study expands upon prior validation work by evaluating the reproducibility of surgeon-directed balancing assessments compared with the modified PKD test across a larger cohort of arthroplasty surgeons. Robotic-assisted TKAs were performed on an advanced knee simulator model previously validated for ligament balancing investigations. After completing blinded polyethylene insert identification trials using manual balance assessments, eight high-volume arthroplasty surgeons underwent additional testing with the modified PKD test. During several testing cycles, polyethylene inserts ranging from 9 to 14 mm were randomly assigned and assessed. For both manual and PKD-assisted evaluations, accuracy, delta error, and intra- and interobserver reliability were computed. Stiffness and laxity behavior were described using oscillatory excursion measurements and logarithmic decrement values. Surgeons correctly identified polyethylene insert thickness manually in 60% of trials and within 1 mm in 84.2% of trials. In contrast, PKD-assisted balancing resulted in 97% correct insert identification (p < 0.001). The mean delta between surgeon-estimated and actual polyethylene thickness was 0.68 mm during manual assessment versus 0.05 mm with the PKD test (p < 0.001). Intraobserver reliability improved from a kappa of 0.61 during manual balancing to 0.96 with PKD assessment, while interobserver reliability improved from 0.38 to 0.97, respectively. The PKD test maintained highly reproducible thickness-independent stiffness ranking patterns across nearly all trials. High-volume arthroplasty surgeons demonstrated substantial variability during subjective soft-tissue balancing assessments, whereas the modified PKD test provided highly reproducible, objective biomechanical characterization of stiffness and laxity during TKA. These expanded findings further validate the PKD methodology as a reproducible tool to quantify soft-tissue knee laxity during robotic-assisted TKA.